ADDITIONAL MENUS
Publication Ethics
Ethics is a very important reference when publishing articles in scientific journals. This is necessary to standardize the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing this scientific journal: authors, editors and reviewers.
WRITER
- Reporting Standards: Authors must provide accurate reporting and research data. The resulting research paper must contain detailed information and sufficient references. Deliberate deception of manuscript content is unethical behavior and the article is unacceptable
- Originality and Plagiarism : Authors must guarantee the authenticity of their work and provide clear information/sources when using quotations. Authors are not allowed to publish their research manuscripts in several journals, because it is an unethical and unacceptable practice to submit the same manuscript to several journals at the same time.
- Acknowledgement of Sources : Authors should always include appropriate acknowledgment of the work of others. Authors should cite publications that are used as the basis for preparing scientific studies.
- Authorship of the Paper :Credit should be limited to researchers who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, conduct, and interpretation of the reported research. All researchers who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Researchers who participated in important aspects of the research must be acknowledged or listed as contributors.The first author must ensure that co-authors meet the requirements for inclusion on the list of researchers, and all authors must review and approve the final version of the manuscript to be published.
- Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest :Each author must disclose in their manuscript any substantive financial or other interests that might be construed to influence the outcome of a manuscript
- Fundamental errors in published works :If the author finds errors or inaccuracies in the published manuscript, the author is expected to notify the editor or editor of the journal and cooperate with the editor to retract or revise the manuscript.
EDITOR
- Publication decisions :The editors are responsible for deciding which articles the editorial board has accepted for publication. Editors can refer to the policies of the journal's editorial board and are limited by applicable legal provisions regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors may also consult with other editors or reviewers in making decisions.
- Fair play :Editors may evaluate manuscripts at any time, without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy
- Confidentiality :The editor and all editorial staff may not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to any party other than the author, reviewers, prospective reviewers, editorial advisors, and editors.
- Disclosure and conflicts of interest : The contents of manuscripts submitted and not published in journals may not be used in the publisher's research without written permission from the author.
Reviewers
- Contribution to Editorial Decisions :Reviewers support editors in editorial decision making and can help authors improve their manuscripts through editorial communications with authors. Auditors are also asked to provide suggestions for improving audit results.
- Promptness :Reviewers who believe that they are not qualified to review the research presented in the manuscript, or who believe that they are not qualified to provide expedited review of the manuscript, should notify the editor and not participate in the peer review process. Invited reviewers must also confirm whether they are willing to review the paper.
- Confidentiality :All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. This manuscript may not be displayed or discussed with other parties without permission from the publisher.
- Standards of Objectivity :Reviews must be carried out objectively. Authors are not permitted to provide criticism. Reviewers must provide clear information about their review findings and supporting arguments.
- Acknowledgement of Sources :Reviewers should identify relevant articles published but not cited by the author. Statements regarding previously reported observations, conclusions, or arguments should be accompanied by appropriate citations. Reviewers should also discuss with the editor any significant similarities between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers to the best of the editor's and reviewer's knowledge.
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest :Information and ideas received from review partners are treated confidentially and may not be used for personal gain. Reviewers may not review manuscripts because of a conflict of interest, collaboration, or other interests with the author, company, or affiliated institution